Popping Pills, Ending Lives

pdf version for easy printing

Pills and prescriptions are supposed to make us feel better. We take pills for headaches, backaches, to lower our blood pressure and pills to fight off infections and diseases. The controversial abortion pill called RU-486 has a purpose other than healing. The purpose of this pill is to kill, taking a life at its earliest stages.

RU-486, a synthetic steroid also known as mifepristone, was developed in 1982. The RU-486 abortion regimine involves combining mifepristone with another drug, misoprostol (a prostaglandin). When combined, the drugs are about 95 percent effective in destroying an unborn child.(1)

The Population Council holds the rights to mifepristone in the United States. It asserts that if this drug is taken within 49 days since the beginning of a woman’s last menstrual cycle, the embryo would only be one-fifth of an inch, “about the size of an aspirin tablet.” The Population Council fails to mention that the embryo’s heart has begun to beat at 35 days of pregnancy (21 days after fertilization); the brain, spinal cord and nervous system are established at 42 days; and by day 49 tiny nostrils are visible and the baby’s hands and feet are beginning to take shape.

When a woman is pregnant her body secretes a natural hormone which prepares the lining of the uterus for a human embryo. Mifepristone blocks this action. The uterus lining softens and breaks down until the embryo is expelled from the body. Sounds simple? Sounds easy? Sounds like a lot of information is missing. The Population Council, other pro-abortion groups, and some media reports make the pill sound like a magic “cure” for any problem pregnancy. Just pop these pills as soon as you find out you’re pregnant or up to week seven of your pregnancy and your life can get back to normal. Not true—chemical abortions are complicated.

During the first visit to the abortion facility, a woman will take mifepristone orally, and will take misoprostol orally during a second visit. A third visit is required later to confirm the death of the unborn child and to check for complications. Even with the use of these two powerful abortion-causing drugs, around five percent of the women will have to have a surgical abortion.

America did not step blindly into the chemical abortion procedure. A small trial in the United States showed the serious ramifications of this procedure.(2) Clinical trials were conducted in the U.S. on 2,121 women from September 1994 to September 1995 at 17 abortion facilities. The Population Council and the New England Journal of Medicine reported these findings:

The most frequent side effects were bleeding and cramping
56 women underwent surgical intervention for excessive bleeding
Four women received blood transfusions
The average duration of bleeding and spotting was 13 days
Gastrointestinal side effects of the drugs, such as nausea, diarrhea and vomiting were documented
8 percent of the women did not abort with the medication and were encouraged to have a surgical abortion
5 percent of the women never completed the study

One important question remains. Are there any long-term effects on women who opt for this medical abortion? For women, it is too soon to know the ultimate ramifications of this chemical cocktail. For the unborn, the long-term effect is clear; a human life ended.

Webcam abortions put women at risk

Planned Parenthood has an ongoing problem finding enough business to afford setting-up abortion clinics in rural areas. Having doctors in the office is a significant cost if there aren’t enough abortions to pay for them. In 2008, Planned Parenthood clinics in Iowa developed webcam abortions as a way around this obstacle. The doctor sits in an office miles away and talks with the patient via webcam, and then presses a button to remotely open a drawer containing the RU-486 for the patient. Planned Parenthood and other abortion clinics have expressed interest in adopting this telemedicine abortion technique, and many states are considering legislation to ban the practice. Michigan banned telemedicine abortions in 2012. Planned Parenthood is happy to save money on doctors examining patients in person before giving them medication that has potentially life-threatening side effects.(3)

Failing to follow the FDA’s instructions

The FDA’s Medication Guide on mifepristone clearly states that women should not take mifepristone if it has been more than 49 days since their last menstrual cycle began. The guide also states that two days after taking mifepristone (also called Mifeprex) the woman should return to the abortion provider and take two misoprostol tablets orally.

Planned Parenthood, America’s number-one abortion provider, and other abortion providers have been violating these guidelines on a consistent basis. They prescribe mifepristone to be taken weeks after the FDA’s Guidelines for safety. They also seek to eliminate the woman’s second visit to the abortion clinic by sending her home with misoprostol and instructing her to take that drug vaginally at home instead of orally at a clinic. A study in the New England Journal of Medicine found that complications from RU-486 abortions double if the pregnancy is 56 to 63 days.(4)

Eliminating the second visit to an abortion clinic and prescribing RU-486 up to two weeks after the FDA’s Medication Guide isn’t physically safer for women but more convenient for the abortion provider who prescribes the pills.

In the span of less than two years, four women from California, Orianne Shevin, Chanelle Bryant, Vivian Tran and Holly Patterson, all died from Clostridium sordelli infections after having an RU-486 abortion. Clostridium sordelli is a bacteria that can, in rare situations, produce fatal toxins.

After these deaths, the FDA issued a public health advisory in July of 2005 to alert abortion providers and the public about the dangers of RU-486 abortion.(5) In the advisory they stated that the “safety and effectiveness of other Mifeprex dosing regimens, including use of oral misoprostol tablets intravaginally has not been established by the FDA.” This warning has fallen on the deaf ears of abortion providers who continue to administer RU-486 abortions in ways that violate guidelines.

Dr. Ralph Miech, a professor at Brown University published an article in the September 2005 issue of the Annals of Pharmacotherapy where he concludes:

"Theoretically, it appears that the mechanisms of mifepristone action favor the development of infection that leads to septic shock and intensifies the actions of multiple inflammatory cytokines, resulting in fulminant, lethal septic shock."(6)

RU-486 is not as safe as abortion advocates would like the public to believe. Women taking these drugs should know the risks.

You at 49 days of pregnancy

Abortion providers may say that the fetus at seven weeks is only the size of an aspirin tablet, but size isn’t the issue. The development of the unborn child through the first 49 days of pregnancy is fascinating. Don’t be fooled into thinking an unborn child is only a blob of tissue during the earliest stages of human life. Learn the facts!

Our lives begin, of course, long before birth. Not open to dispute is the fact that every one of us began our lives at the moment of fertilization. How much do you know about your own beginnings? Let’s take a look at your history.

At fertilization, sperm joined ovum to form a single cell which, miraculously, contained the genetic blueprint for every detail of your development: Sex, hair and eye color, height, skin tone and more. Over the next week, you traveled through your mother’s fallopian tube to her uterus, implanting in the nutrient rich lining. By week five (only 21 days after fertilization), your heart was beating. By week six the foundation of your brain and nervous system had be laid. Your tiny heart was already pumping blood, and beated about 100 times a minute. You were 1/8 of an inch long.

Your tiny nostrils were probably visible and your hands and feet were beginning to take shape, along with your facial features: ears, nose, lips, tongue and even tiny teeth.

By day 49, you were about 1/4 of an inch long. Tiny though you were, your size didn’t matter then; life began for you at the moment of fertilization.

FDA approval of RU-486 remains questionable

The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved RU-486 as a chemical method to end the life of a developing unborn child on September 28, 2000. On that day, the FDA stepped out of the healing business and into the killing business. Under former President George H.W. Bush, RU-486 was banned from the United States. Its deadly effects could not kill unborn humans and could not injure women. But under the Clinton Administration, RU-486 was welcomed to America, welcomed to slaughter innocent lives, welcomed to haunt women who regret aborting their unborn children, and welcomed to disintegrate families in America.

When the FDA approved RU-486, it did so under an accelerated process for drug approval called “21 CFR 314 Subpart H.” According to the FDA, this accelerated process is supposed to only be used to “accelerate approval of certain drugs for serious or life-threatening illnesses.”

Before RU-486, there were only 30 drugs that had been approved under Subpart H, all of which were for treatment of HIV/AIDS, cancer, and other debilitating diseases. Since RU-486 was approved under an accelerated process, it didn’t have to go through any long-term effects studies that other drugs go through. No one knows if these two drugs will cause more serious side effects, to the women that use them, later in life.

Another “red flag” was raised regarding RU-486 when a letter was sent to health care providers from the drug company Searle. Searle was the manufacturer of misoprostol (also known as Cytotec). In an August 23, 2000, letter to health practitioners, Searle said “Cytotec is not approved for the induction of labor and abortion.” Searle also warns abortionists about “serious adverse events” such as maternal death and “uterine hyperstimulation, rupture, and perforation” which can take place when Cytotec is taken for an “off-label” use.

1 - Irving M. Spitz et al., “Early Pregnancy Termination with Mifepristone and Misoprostol in the United States,” New England Journal of Medicine 338, no. 18 (1998): 1241-1247.
2 - Ibid.
3 - Monica Davey, “Abortion Drugs Given in Iowa via Video Link,” The New York Times, 9 June 2010, A1.
4 - Irving M. Spitz et al., “Early Pregnancy Termination with Mifepristone and Misoprostol in the United States,” New England Journal of Medicine 338, no. 18 (1998): 1241-1247.
5 - Available online on the FDA website: www.fda.gov
6 - Ralph Miech, “Pathophysiology of Mifepristone-Induced Septic Shock Due to Clostridium sordelli,” Annal of Pharmacotherapy 39, no. 9 (2005): 1483-1488.








© RIGHT TO LIFE OF MICHIGAN, 2340 PORTER ST SW, PO BOX 901, GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49509-0901, (616) 532-2300