Home

Parental Consent Law Amendment

 S.B. 254 - Sen. Dave Robertson

Current Status

S.B. 254 was introduced on March 12, 2013, and referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee. The Judiciary Committee took up the bill on June, 18, 2013. After only a brief amount of testimony, the committee reported the bill by a 3-1 vote. With the Legislature in recess for the summer, no action is expected on the bill until at least the fall.


Description
Michigan's parental consent law mandates that before an abortion can be performed on a minor, one of her parents must consent in writing. The law also permits a minor to seek a judicial bypass. In this process, the minor girl petitions the court for a waiver of parental consent, arguing that she has sufficient maturity to make the decision independent of her parents.


S.B. 254 closes a loophole in the parental consent law, preventing the practice of "judge shopping" among minors seeking a judicial bypass for abortion. Minor girls who have been denied a judicial bypass at one court would not be permitted to seek a bypass at another county court. If there is an unanticipated change in her family situation or circumstances of her pregnancy, she would be permitted to request a rehearing, in addition to her right to an expedited appeal. S.B. 254 also creates guidelines for judges in making a determination regarding the maturity of the girl seeking an abortion, and her best interests. These guidelines are consistent with the line of questioning recommended by the Michigan Benchbook, and include taking into consideration whether the minor girl’s parents have neglected or abused her.

Background
The testimony of Michigan judges and anecdotal evidence reveal that minor girls seeking an abortion are engaging in "judge shopping." Instead of following the expedited appeal process after a denial, they bring a new petition in a neighboring county court without the knowledge of the prior court. In many cases, these minor girls are being assisted by abortion providers, who offer help in "navigating the judicial system," according to one Michigan abortion facility’s website.

In addition, currently there are no statutory guidelines for judges when making determinations about a minor’s maturity level and best interests.

History
In the 2003-2004 session, the House and Senate passed a similar measure, but Governor Granholm vetoed the bill. In the 2007-2008 session, legislators introduced a revised bill that addressed the false issues raised by Governor Granholm when she vetoed the prior bill. The revised bill passed the Senate but died in the House. In the 2011-12 session, S.B. 135 was introduced and approved by the Senate, but was not taken up by the House.

For the history of Michigan’s law requiring parental consent for abortion, click here.

 

 

© RIGHT TO LIFE OF MICHIGAN, 2340 PORTER ST SW, PO BOX 901, GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49509-0901, (616) 532-2300
PRIVACY POLICY | VIDEO/IMAGE USAGE POLICY