Should we support research?
Addressing human embryo stem cell research
Embryonic stem cell research is one of the most controversial issues
of the day. Some believe stem cells from human embryos are human
enough for research, but not human enough to join the human family.
This logic defies the reality that life begins at conception.
Q: Stem cells aren't alive, right? If stem
cells possess life-saving possibilities, why shouldn't they be used
for research?
A: A living human embryo must be destroyed in order to obtain embryonic
stem cells. Every time embryonic stem cells are extracted from a
human embryo, a unique individual is destroyed. The removed stem
cells would have developed into the child's heart, kidneys and all
of the 210 different kinds of tissue found in the human body .
Q: Is it true that stem cells are just taken
from frozen fertilized eggs?
A: No, the unborn child must be more than a fertilized egg before
stem cells are able to be extracted from her. A fertilized egg is
the term used to describe a one-cell human in its first day of development.
A fertilized egg does not have any stem cells to extract because
it is only one cell. Embryonic stem cells are removed from embryos
who are around a week old. These embryos are called blastocysts
and they number several hundred cells.
Q: Does an embryo look human?
A: Yes, it does look human. An embryo looks exactly like every
human looked during this stage of development. Every human looked
the same shortly after conception. Just because people aren't as
familiar with this stage of development doesn't mean that an embryo
isn't human and doesn't look like a human.
Q: Won't all of these embryos just be destroyed
anyway, so why shouldn't they be used for helpful research?
A: Embryonic research advocates act like all of the embryos in
fertility clinics that aren't used will be thrown away. This, however,
is simply not the case. The parents generally have at least two
other options. First, preserve the embryos for possible future use
(chosen by about 90%). Two, donate the embryos to another couple
so they can have a child. Even if the embryos are going to be destroyed,
that doesn't mean that society has the right to experiment with
their bodies.
Q: Are embryos the only place that we can
find stem cells?
A: There are many life-affirming alternatives to stem cells taken
from destroyed embryos. Adult stem cells and umbilical cord stem
cells offer great hope.
Q: Haven't embryonic stem cells helped people
already?
A: Actually, embryonic stem cells have probably done more damage
than help to humans. The whole argument behind research on embryonic
stem cells is based on potential cures not current cures.
Back to table of contents