Nothing could be more wrong -- or more dangerous to prolifers!
According to a well-respected political commentator, some 90 percent of eventual Michigan state house open-seat winners are determined in the primary. On the surface this seems like a silly statement: aren't all eventual winners determined in the primary? After all, the only candidates who run in the general election are those who get through the primary.
True enough, but looking at the primary elections from a different perspective should convince you just how important your primary vote really is in electing prolife candidates. Consider this...
Most districts will have a tendency to vote for one party in just about every election. These trends are carefully tracked over time and the eventual outcome can usually be predicted with nearly 100 percent accuracy. Political researchers rate districts on the basis of "safe Democrat," "likely Democrat," "lean Democrat," "marginal" (could go either way), "lean Republican," "likely Republican," and "safe Republican."
If prolifers can get prolife Democrat candidates through the primary in "safe" or "likely" Democrat districts... and prolife Republican candidates through the primary in 51 "safe" or "likely" Republican districts, it's safe to say that we'll have a majority of prolife legislators in the Michigan state house to begin the 1999 legislative year!
Voting in primary elections is also essential for prolifers because of the relatively low voter turnout in primaries. When vote totals are down, it takes fewer votes to make a difference. Since it takes fewer votes to win; the organization,