In June 1996, a similar amendment to the Jaye-Ciaramitaro
amendment was adopted to prohibit public funding for university
school employees' abortion coverage, or risk having state funding
reduced dollar-for-dollar when abortions are covered. However,
universities have indicated that they will probably challenge
this provision in court as unconstitutional because the Michigan
constitution gives universities broad autonomy in governing themselves.
To date, the lawsuit has not yet been filed.
In June 1997, with the failure of the Jaye amendment on the House
floor and the constitutional difficulties regarding university
autonomy, an amendment to eliminate abortion coverage for university
employees was not offered in the Senate. A new creative
approach to the university employee situation will have to be
developed.
Also in 1997, a similar amendment to the K-12 public school budget
was adopted.
The K-12 public school budget and the community college budgets
were successfully amended on the House floor in nearly identical
amendments offered by Representatives David Jaye and Mark Jansen.
The Jaye amendment was adopted on 4/24/97, and the Jansen amendment
was adopted on 5/13/97. After a fight in the Senate (the
Senate Appropriations committee stripped the amendments and Senator
Dale Shugars offered them on the Senate floor, placing them back
in the bills), the amendments were successfully adopted on 6/3/97
and 6/4/97. Then the bills went to the House-Senate conference
committees to work out the final language. Because the Jaye/Jansen
and Shugars K-12 amendments had identical language, the conference
committee was not allowed to change that language.
Soon after being passed, school districts and teachers' unions
found a technicality in the collective bargaining law to skirt
the law (which has the possibility of proving illegal if challenged).
They simply get a majority of union members to vote on adding
abortion as a rider to their policy, which is still paid for by
the school district.
Due to a technical error, a one-word difference was discovered
between the Jansen amendment and the Shugars amendment regarding
abortion benefits in the Community Colleges budget. The
one-word difference (omission) allowed the conference committee
to address the amendment. The conference committee chair,
Senator Harry Gast, who opposed the Shugars amendment seized the
opportunity, with the support of other conferees, and worked to
water down the language. The language as finally approved
by the House and Senate stated that it is the intention
of the Legislature that community colleges eliminate abortion
benefits. This watered down language was basically ignored
by community college administrators in fiscal year 1997-98.
On June 9, 1998 and June 10, 1998, language in the Community
Colleges and Higher Education budget was added on the House floor
to eliminate abortion health benefits, taking effect September
1, 1998. However, the impact of the provisions will be delayed
until current contracts expire, as the prohibition is contingent
on new contracts being negotiated.
- Abortion Coverage for Public Employees
Senator David Jaye along with many of his Senate colleagues,
on 4/28/98 introduced a 15-bill package that would prohibit abortion
coverage for all public employees, including local governments
and municipalities. The bills, S.B. 1060-1068, S.B. 1074-1078,
and S.B. 1085 have been referred to the Senate Families, Mental
Health & Human Services Committee. A similar package,
H.B. 6096, H.B. 6097, H.B. 6099 and H.B. 6100 - H.B. 109, was
introduced in the House. The bills died at the close of
the 1997-98 session.