Lifenotes
Cruel and Usual Punishment
Since abortion has been legalized there have been many techniques
promoted to end the life of a developing unborn child. The following
are methods used to perform abortions and possible complications
from the procedures.
First Trimester
Suction Curettage (Vacuum Aspiration)- This is the most extensively
used abortion technique, especially during first trimester abortions.
It is performed in approximately 97% of abortion procedures1
. In this procedure, the cervix is dilated by a group of instruments.
A powerful suction tube with a knife-like edge on the tip is
inserted into the uterus. The suction or vacuum dismembers the
unborn child and sucks her out of the womb. The abortionist
must also use his tool to remove the placenta, blood, and amniotic
fluid.
Complications of Suction Curettage- The most
frequent post-abortion complication is infection. Infection
can occur if any of the fetal or placental tissue is left in
the uterus2 . Another possible complication is uterine hemorrhage.
Hemorrhaging can occur if the uterus is punctured during the
abortion3 .
Dilatation and Curettage (D&C)-
In this abortion method, the cervix is dilated so a steel knife
with a loop shape can be inserted into the uterus. The abortionist
then uses this knife to scrape the wall of the uterus. This
scraping cuts the unborn child to pieces and removes both the
child and placenta from the uterine wall.
Complications from D & C- The
most apparent complication from this procedure is extensive
bleeding. Other common complications include infection and uterine
perforation4 .
RU486 (Abortion Pill)- RU486
is a combination of two drugs used to expel a child from the
womb. During the first visit to the abortion clinic, a woman
will take mifepristone orally. Mifepristone blocks natural hormones
that maintain the nutrient rich lining of the uterus. The developing
baby dies as the lining of the uterus disintegrates. On the
second visit to the doctor, the woman takes misoprostol, which
was originally designed as an ulcer medicine, to produce powerful
contractions. After taking this drug, most women abort within
4 hours, but 30 percent abort their children later at work,
home, etc5 . On the third visit to the clinic, the abortionist
will confirm the death of the unborn child and check for complications.
Complications of RU486- In the
clinical trials performed in the U.S. on 2,121 women from September
1994 to September 1995, a large number of complications were
documented. The New England Journal of Medicine reported these
findings: the most frequent side effects were bleeding and cramping;
nausea and vomiting were also frequent; 56 women underwent surgical
intervention for excessive bleeding; 4 women received blood
transfusions; the average duration of bleeding was 13 days,
and 170 women or 8 percent of the women didn’t abort their unborn
children and were encouraged to have a surgical abortion6 .
On September 24, 1995, the Waterloo Courier (Iowa) printed a
letter from Dr. Mark Louviere, in which he described a women
who lost half her blood and almost died from RU-486 complications.
It should also be noted that there haven’t been any long-term
effects studies done with these drugs so no one is certain if
there are any possible long-term side effects from using these
two drugs.
Second Trimester
Salt Poisoning (Saline Amniocentesis)-After
16 weeks-In this procedure, a needle with a solution of concentrated
salt is inserted through the woman’s abdomen into the amniotic
sac. The child breathes in the salt and is poisoned. It usually
takes around an hour for the unborn child to die. After 33 to
35 hours the woman goes into labor and delivers a dead, shriveled
baby7 .
Complications of Salt Poisoning-
One possible side effect of salt poisoning is that the mother
might get a condition called consumption coagulopathy, which
is uncontrolled blood clotting throughout the body, with severe
hemorrhaging and other serious side effects to the nervous system8
. If the abortionist misses the womb and injects the saline
solution into the woman’s vascular system, seizures, coma, or
death can result9 . This procedure is outlawed in Japan and
other countries because of these risks to the woman10 .
Dilation and Evacuation (D & E) -12
to 24 weeks- This procedure was developed since salt poisoning
was considered too dangerous and has largely replaced it as
the second-trimester abortion procedure11 . In this method,
the cervix is dilated so grasping forceps can be inserted into
the uterus. At this stage in development, the child’s bones
have hardened, so the baby can no longer be removed by suction
or scraping. The abortionist uses these forceps to dismember
different parts of the child, such as arms and legs. The child’s
head is often too large to be removed from the womb, so the
abortionist must crush the skull in order to remove it. When
the procedure is over, a nurse will attempt to reassemble the
body parts to make sure that there is nothing left in the uterus.
Complications of D & E-Bleeding
is usually profuse and infection can occur if the abortionist
doesn’t remove all of the pieces of the child’s body from the
womb. This procedure, along with D & C, is performed blindly
with the abortionist using only his or her sense of feel. If
an abortionist isn’t careful, the uterus, bladder, and bowels
can be punctured.
Partial-Birth Abortion (D & X)-20
weeks and beyond-This is a three day procedure. During the first
two days, the pregnant woman’s cervix is anesthetizedand dilated.
On the day of the operation,the abortionist uses a sonogram
to find the child’s leg. Once the abortionist has a hold of
a leg with forceps, the child is pulled through the birth canal
until the whole child is delivered except for the head. The
abortionist then forces scissors into the base of the skull
and spreads the scissors so a suction catheter can be put into
this hole and evacuate the contents of the skull12 .
Complications of D & X- In
order to unnaturally dilate a women’s cervix, an abortionist
must insert laminaria, a few at a time, over a 3 to 5 day period.
This unnatural dilatation can cause various complications such
as large amounts of pain, infection, and an incompetent cervix,
which makes it difficult for women to have children in the future.
Complications that are possible when the abortionist is reaching
for the child’s foot include hemorrhage, uterine perforation,
uterine rupture, amniotic fluid embolus, and trauma to the uterus.
The complications that are possible when the abortionist blindly
inserts scissors into the child’s skull are laceration of the
uterus or cervix by the scissors and could result in severe
bleeding and the threat of shock or even maternal death13.
Specialized Abortion Procedure
Fetal Reduction- With the use of in-vitro fertilization,
a specialized form of abortion is being used. This form of abortion
is called fetal reduction. When a woman attempts to become pregnant
with in vitro fertilization, usually multiple embryos are placed
in her womb. This method, which increases the probability of
pregnancy also increases the probability of a multiple pregnancy.
Women who become pregnant with more than two children can elect
for fetal reduction. During a fetal reduction procedure, a needle
is inserted into the heart of the unborn child. The child is
then injected with potassium chloride (a saline solution) and
dies. The least-healthy looking or easiest to kill fetuses are
usually reduced.
Overview of Complications
Early Complications. The following are complications
for women which may be identified a
few weeks after an abortion.
Bleeding: In many women, the
bleeding is so profuse that blood transfusions are required.
Infection: The damage done can
range from mild to fatal. Compared to hospitals, the rate of
infections in abortion clinics with far inferior care is at
least doubled14. The usual infection is called pelvic inflammatory
disease (PID). PID is difficult to control and can lead to sterility
even when there is prompt treatment. Some women with PID can
have chronic pain for the rest of their lives15 . Failure to
remove parts of the child: If an abortionist leaves part of
a child inside the womb during an abortion, severe infection
may result. This infection would cause severe cramping and bleeding,
and if the infection persists, the woman may have to have a
hysterectomy (removal of the womb).
Embolisms: Since abortion is
an unnatural procedure that the body isn’t ready for, the slicing
of the placenta from the uterine wall can cause fluids around
the child, pieces of tissue, or blood clots to enter the woman’s
circulation. These then travel to the lungs of the woman causing
damage and occasionally death16 .
Long-Term Complications. Many
of the complications from abortion might not be seen until years
after the abortion takes place and might not even be recognized
as complications of abortion.
Ectopic Pregnancy: An ectopic
pregnancy occurs when an embryo implants at a site other than
the lining of the uterus. The child will continue to grow in
a place outside of the womb, often in the fallopian tube.Surgery
is then required to remove the child, in order to save the mother.
Studies have shown that women who abort their first pregnancy
increase their risk of having an ectopic pregnancy by 500%17
. Centers for Disease Control reports that about 100,000 ectopic
pregnancies occur each year which is a rise of over 500% since
the pre-Roe v. Wade number of 17,800 in 1970. The CDC also reports
that “ectopic pregnancies are the leading cause of pregnancy-related
deaths in the first trimester and account for 9% of all pregnancy
related deaths in this country.”
Increase in Miscarriages and Other Pregnancy
Complications: Studies have shown that abortion during
the first pregnancy can cause significant increases in complications
with later pregnancies18. Another study shows that pregnancy
failure is increased 45% if a woman has had one previous abortion18
. Other studies showed that premature births, neonatal deaths,
and miscarriages in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy
were significantly increased in women who had experienced an
induced abortion20, 21, 22.
Breast Cancer: In studies across
the United States and in other countries, it has been found
that women who have had abortions have a higher chance of getting
breast cancer later in life. These are studies that have been
done by professionals and are published in respected medical
journals. One study, done in 1990, that summarized findings
in medical studies from Canada, Denmark, France, Israel, Japan,
the United States, and the USSR, found that “abortions, either
multiple or occurring before the first full term pregnancy,
have been shown to be significantly associated with breast cancer
risks23.” A study done by the National Cancer Institute in Washington
found that women who had an abortion increased their risk of
getting breast cancer by 50%. This risk was more than doubled
if the woman’s abortion (or first abortion) took place before
the age of 18 or over the age of 3024. Abortion’s link to breast
cancer is theorized to exist because abortion is an unnatural
procedure which stops the natural condition of a woman’s breasts
getting ready to produce milk for her child. In early pregnancy,
a woman’s breast tissue grows and begins to differentiate to
cells that will produce milk. An abortion stops this natural
process, so many of the cells that would have produced milk
are now undifferentiated cells. These cells are much more capable
of turning into cancer cells then the cells that were present
before she became pregnant.
Sterility: Other complications
of abortion, such as infections, can often cause scar tissue
in the womb. If the scar tissue covers the opening between the
uterus and the fallopian tubes, it is impossible for a sperm
to fertilize a woman’s egg. If fertilization can’t occur then
a woman can’t become pregnant through natural means.
Psychological Consequences: Although
a woman might not be harmed physically by an abortion, there
is a good possibility that she could be hurt psychologically.
Research is providing evidence that having an abortion can have
negative psychological effects. Researchers have found that
at least 19% of post-aborted women suffer from symptoms such
as, but not limited to: feelings of intense grief or depression
because of the abortion, anxiety attacks, difficulty concentrating,
irritability, flashbacks to the abortion experience, recurrent
thoughts about their aborted child, and nightmares or sleeping
disorders25. The term for this specific group of symptoms is
post- abortion syndrome or PAS. PAS has been proposed as a subset
of PTSD (post traumatic stress disorder). People who have PTSD
often try to suppress their feelings about a traumatic event.
They often want to, but are unable to, express their feelings
and emotions about this event. Women with PAS will often do
whatever they can to get rid of their feelings of guilt, including
drug and alcohol use.
Even though some abortions are performed without
complications, there is no such thing as a safe abortion. In
every “successful” abortion, an innocent child dies. The woman
might not always be harmed but the child always is.
References:
1CDC’s Abortion Surveillance 1997.
2Jane E. Hodgson, M.D., “Abortion by Vacuum Aspiration,” Abortion
and Sterilization:
Medical and Social Aspects, Jane E. Hodgson, ed., (New York:
Academic Press, Grune and
Strathon, 1981), pp. 256, 260-261.
3Ibid, pp. 256-258.
4Gary F. Cunningham, M.D., et. al, Williams Obstetrics, 19th
ed., (Norwalk, CT: Appleton &
Lang, 1993), p. 683.
5Population Council of New York, Release, October 27, 1994,
p. 3.
6Irving M. Spitz, C. Wayne Bardin, Lauri Benton, Ann Robins,
“Early Pregnancy Termination
with Mifepristone and Misoprostol in the United States,” New
England Journal of Medicine, Vol.
338, No. 18 (April 30, 1998), pp. 1241-1247.
7Stephen L. Corson., M.D., et al, Fertility Control, (Boston:
Little, Brown, and Company,
1985), pp. 82-83.
8James R. Scott, M.D., et al, Danforth’s Obstetrics and Gynecology,
6th ed.,(Philadelphia: J.B.
Lippincott, 1990), p. 726.
9R. Bolognese and S. Corson, Interruption of Pregnancy– A Total
Patient Approach,
(Baltimore: Wilkins and Wilkins, 1985), p. 136.
10Thomas D. Kerenyi, Abortion and Sterilization: Medical and
Social Aspects, edited by Jane E.
Hodgson, (New York: Academic Press Grune and Strathon, 1981),
p. 360.
11Dr. and Mrs. J.C. Willke, Why can’t We Love them Both, (Cincinnati:
Hayes Publishing
Company, 1997), p. 120.
12Martin Haskell, M.D., “Dilation and Extraction for Late Second
Trimester,” in “Second
Trimester Abortion: From Every Angle,” Fall Risk Management
Seminar, September 13-14,
1992, Dallas, Texas, National Abortion Federation.
13M. LeRoy Sprang, MD and Mark G. Neerhof, “Rationale for Banning
Abortions Late in
Pregnancy,” Journal of the American Medical Association, volume:
280, August 26, 1998, p.
744.
14C. Gassner and C. Ballard, American Journal Obstetrics and
Gynecology, vol. 48, p. 716.
15M. Spence, “PID: Detection and Treatment,” Sexually Transmitted
Disease Bulletin, Johns
Hopkins University, vol. 3, no 1, February 1983.
16W. Cates, et al., American Journal Obstetrics and Gynecology,
vol. 132, p. 16.
17Chung, et al., “Effects of Induced Abortion Complications
on Subsequent Reproductive
Function,” U. of Hawaii, Honolulu.
18Stanislaw Leinbrych, M.D., “Fertility Problems Following Aborted
First Pregnancy,” New
Perspectives On Human Abortion, edited by Hilgers, Horan, Mall,
(Frederick, Maryland;
University Publication of America, 1981) pp. 120-134.
19C. Madore, et. al., “A Study on the Effects of Induced Abortion
on Subsequent Pregnancy
Outcome,” American Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1981, vol. 139,
pp. 516-521.
20American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 102, No. 3, 1975, pp.
217-224.
21Wright, et. al., Lancet, June 10 1972, 1, pp. 1278-1279.
22J. Richardson and G. Dixon, British Medical Journal, 1976,
1, pp. 1303,-1304
23L. Remennick, “Induced Abortion as a Cancer Risk Factor: A
Review of Epidemiological
Evidence,” Journal of Epidemiological Community Health, 1990,
44: 259-264.
24J.R. Daling., K.E. Malone, L.F. Voight, E. White, and N.S.
Weiss, “Risk of Breast Cancer
Among Young Women: A Relationship to Individual Abortion,” Journal
of the National Cancer
Institute, 1994, 86: 1584-1592.
25C. Barnard, The Long-Term Psychological Effects of Abortion,
(Portsmouth,N.H: Institute for
Pregnancy Loss, 1990).
Produced by: Right to Life of Michigan • PO Box
901 • Grand Rapids MI 49509 • www.rtl.org